 |
 |
Facebook’s Public Search Listing Policy Pretty Skeezy - April 7th, 2009 |
 |
|
As of September 5 2007, Facebook started offering data about you publicly to non-friends and non-facebook users with what as known as your Public Search Listing. Because facebook is such a popular site, if you have a unique name, often your public search listing will be one of the first sites that come up if your name is googled.
This URL of your public search listing is currently http://www.facebook.com/people/Your-Name/YourFacebookID.
Supposedly, facebook allows you to control whether this page exists with the preference on your privacy page, Settings > Privacy > “Create a public search listing for me and submit it for search engine indexing.” If you uncheck this checkbox, and log out of facebook, your page will return a “Page not Found” error page with your image, friends, and fan pages removed.
However, this page will still remain as one of the top results for your name.
Why? Web browsers, search engines and web servers use header codes to determine the status of a page. Headers codes include 200 OK, 301 redirect, 302 found, and 404 not found. If facebook were to honestly remove your page, they would return a 404 not found header when you go to your public search listing URL. But this is not what is occurring:
Try running curl -I http://www.facebook.com/people/Your-Public-Facebook-URL, a command that returns the headers of a document. Even months after you have turned off your public search listing, this is the result:
HTTP/1.1 302 Found
In my opinion this is dishonest of facebook. Google sees this “page not found” error page but doesn’t detect it as an error because the header is falsely returning 302, so it has no reason to remove the page from your search results. This combined with facebook’s policy of requiring you to use your full name, its SEO tactics of having your full name in the URL and also having it appear in the source code (via javascript) 85 times, means this link is never going to go away unless Facebook actually changes their public search listing policy. Because Facebook is such a large site, even if no one links to this page besides Facebook, it still will be a top result in google.
This is just an inconvenience for me, having anyone know that I am on facebook, but it is a real privacy issue for people who would like to reconnect with old friends but need to hide from abusive spouses, exes, stalkers or the like.
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Brief fox news rant 3/23 - March 23rd, 2009 |
 |
|
I’m taking care of a sick relative whose mother blares fox news on the TV all day, every day. As a result I have the privilege of listening to Hannity, O’Reilly and Beck every day now. There’s no escaping it; I hear the angry heads news network when I’m trying to work, trying to sleep, trying to read. Some days I can take it, other days I just want to scream back at the TV.
Tonight’s “headline” was “Is Obama in over his head?” Does he know what he’s doing? Isn’t he too inexperienced to handle this job?
Their first guest to answer the question was Newt Gingrich.
How is this a fucking news story? It’s a hit job no different than the attack ads during the campaign. Bush couldn’t even speak english, and yet it was not headline news anywhere that he was in over his head.
I *hate* how they continue to call their network fair and balanced, as if to mock us. They’ve used plenty of unfair editing tactics and just plain shouting to silence progressive guests, but it seems like they’re not even trying anymore. Your first expert on this non-news story is former speaker of the house and leader of the republican party? How many times do you have Pelosi on? Or other democratic house leaders? Hoyer? Gephardt?
You can expect these rants to continue as I continue to have to endure this loud bullshit.
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
US accused of holding terror suspects on prison ships - June 2nd, 2008 |
 |
|
This article makes me furious. From the Guardian:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/jun/02/usa.humanrights
From the article:
“By its own admission, the US government is currently detaining at least 26,000 people without trial in secret prisons, and information suggests up to 80,000 have been ‘through the system’ since 2001.”
EIGHTY THOUSAND people? Where is the outrage? How are we, the freeest country in the world, allowing our government to “disappear” and torture people without trial? Eighty thousand? How can anyone possibly argue that eighty thousand people are guilty without trial and deserve this kind of treatment?
- “In Germany, they came first for the Communists, And I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Communist;
- And then they came for the trade unionists, And I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a trade unionist;
- And then they came for the Jews, And I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Jew;
- And then . . . they came for me . . . And by that time there was no one left to speak up.”
-
- - Martin Niemöller
80,000 people, guys. 80,000.
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
|